Elsevier

Clinical Biomechanics

Volume 82, February 2021, 105252
Clinical Biomechanics

Influence of age, gender and obesity on pressure discomfort threshold of the foot: A cross-sectional study.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2020.105252Get rights and content

Highlights

  • It shows a pattern for Pressure Discomfort Threshold in the foot plantar surface.

  • This discomfort pattern changes due to aging, gender and body mass index.

  • The findings can have important implications on orthosis and footwear design.

Abstract

Background

Foot pain is a highly prevalent health problem for which measures such as a pattern of Pressure Discomfort Threshold of the foot plantar surface can provide valuable information for orthosis design. This study aimed to describe such pattern as a tool for the assessment of painful conditions of the feet and to analyse how it modifies according to age, gender and obesity.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was performed with participants allocated in: Group 1 people aged 20 to 35 years, Group 2 aged 50 to 65 years and Group 3 aged over 65. Pressure Discomfort Threshold on twelve points of the foot plantar surface was measured with an adapted manual dynamometer. Inferential analyses of the data were performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) considering foot areas, age group, gender and obesity.

Findings

36 participants were analysed. The pattern of Pressure Discomfort Threshold for all individuals showed a significantly higher threshold on the heel and external foot (P < 0.001, η2 = 0.124) and was statistical significantly influenced by age (P < 0.001, η2 = 0.17), especially in participants aged over 65; by gender, with women having higher values (P < 0.001, η2 = 0.13), and by obesity (P < 0.001, η2 = 0.19).

Interpretation

A Pressure Discomfort Threshold pattern exists in the foot plantar surface. The characteristics of the discomfort pattern of the foot and its association with aging, gender and obesity may have considerable implications for orthosis and footwear design.

Introduction

Foot pain is a highly prevalent health problem, 29% of women and 19% of men suffer from it.(Awale et al., 2016) The existence of high plantar pressures in certain areas of the foot has been associated to pain and discomfort(Mickle et al., 2010) even leading to hyperkeratosis(Barlow et al., 1990) and, subsequently, metatarsal and heel pain, especially in older people.(Akdemir et al., 2011; Hill et al., 2008) In addition, alteration of foot function in one area can instigate unfavourable outcomes such as high pressure onto a new area, imbalance and/or injury when walking.(Mickle et al., 2010)

Foot pressure has different effects, thus depending on its magnitude the resulting sensation can vary from superficial touch to pain, previously passing through discomfort.(Hong et al., 2005) Whereas superficial touch provides the sensory feed-back necessary for balance and locomotion, discomfort and pain are mechanisms that warn of potentially harmful situations.(Xiong et al., 2010)

The most frequent treatment options are advice acquiring appropriate fit shoes, plantar orthosis or footwear modifications.(van der Zwaard et al., 2011) Therefore, minimising foot pain and discomfort due to pressure generated during human locomotion is an important user requirement for plantar orthosis or shoes.

Pressure pain threshold (PPT), understood as the minimum pressure that induces pain, has been evaluated at selected locations or through a full plantar surface map.(Weerasinghe et al., 2017) It is generally accepted that discomfort is a precursor of pain. Thus, pressure discomfort threshold (PDT) understood as the minimum pressure that produces discomfort(Johansson et al., 1999) is presented as a more suitable standard in product design.(Goonetilleke, 2006) A foot plantar PDT pattern can provide valuable information for footwear and orthosis design, aid in preventing pain and identify individuals who may be at risk of developing or worsening an injury due to high pressure. It could also be useful in order to detect patients with loss of hypersensitivity and to evaluate the effects of treatments on various pathological conditions. But before studying the different conditions, the existence of normal patterns in healthy subjects are needed. However, few studies have focused on it.(Gonzalez et al., n.d.; Johansson et al., 1999; Weerasinghe et al., 2017; Xiong et al., 2010)

In addition, there are several potential risk factors for foot pain and discomfort that have been identified from cross-sectional studies, and should be taken in consideration: increased age with a prevalence between 14.9 and 41.9% of adults aged over 50 years,(Gorter et al., 2000) gender, with women having higher prevalence of foot pathologies(Dufour et al., 2009) and obesity, with obese people possibly being more sensitive to pain.(Okifuji et al., 2009) Unfortunately, there is limited knowledge on how foot discomfort relates to age, gender or body mass index (BMI).

In the present study it was hypothesized that there are different PDT depending on different areas of the foot plantar surface and that it modifies with age, gender and increase of BMI. Therefore, the main purpose of this study is to describe a pattern of PDT as a tool for the assessment of painful conditions of the foot.

Section snippets

Study design

A cross-sectional study was performed at the Biomechanics Institute of Valencia (Instituto de Biomecánica de Valencia) from January to March 2019. Participants were allocated to three different groups according to their age: Group 1 (G1) people aged 20 to 35, Group 2 (G2) aged 50 to 65 and Group 3 (G3) aged over 65. The gender distribution was done for the full sample in a balanced way to avoid possible biases, although it was not possible to balance all groups.

Each participant was assessed

Results

From the eligible 45 possible participants 36 were finally included (Fig. 2), aged between 20 and 81 (mean age 34.91, SD 17.60) and 50% women. A 30.56% of the sample had a BMI of 30 or more and were, therefore, considered obese. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants by age groups are depicted in Table 1. Variable distribution showed to be normal by the Shapiro-Wilk test.

Pearson's correlation between the pressure registered when the subject pronounced “Stop” was high both

Discussion

The results of the present study confirm the hypothesis that there is a PDT pattern for the foot surface and that it depends on age, gender and obesity. The three points of the heel area are the ones that have higher PDT with significant differences with the rest of the areas.

In general, heel and external midfoot areas showed more tolerance to higher pressures than the rest. These are the areas bearing most of the foot contact when walking, so they bear higher loads, are adapted to such an

Conclusions

This study has shown a pattern for PDT in the foot plantar surface, with significant higher thresholds on the heel and the midfoot which are related to first contact and adaptation when walking. Moreover, this research has provided an overview of the changes in the discomfort pattern of the foot associated with aging, gender and BMI, and that have considerable implications. There is a turning point around 65 years old when PDT is increased significantly on the heel, midfoot, and forefoot

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article. No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.

Statement of the authors

All authors were fully involved in the study and preparation of the manuscript and the material within has not been and will not be submitted for publication elsewhere. Each of the authors has read and concurs with the content in the final manuscript.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

References (39)

  • K.J. Mickle et al.

    Obese older adults suffer foot pain and foot-related functional limitation

    Gait Posture

    (2015 Oct)
  • R. Periyasamy et al.

    The effect of aging on the hardness of foot sole skin: a preliminary study

    Foot Edinb. Scotl.

    (2012 Jun)
  • O. Akdemir et al.

    New alternative in treatment of callus

    J. Dermatol.

    (2011)
  • A. Awale et al.

    Link between foot pain severity and prevalence of depressive symptoms

    Arthritis Care Res.

    (2016)
  • A. Barlow et al.

    Foot problems in the elderly

    Clin. Rehabil.

    (1990 Aug)
  • K.J. Berkley et al.

    Sex and gender differences in pain and inflammation: a rapidly maturing field

    Am. J. Phys. Regul. Integr. Comp. Phys.

    (2006 Aug)
  • R.P. Betts et al.

    Analysis of pressure and loads under the foot. II. Quantitation of the dynamic distribution

    Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas.

    (1980)
  • T. Duckworth et al.

    Plantar pressure measurements and the prevention of ulceration in the diabetic foot

    J. Bone Joint Surg. (Br.)

    (1985 Jan)
  • A.B. Dufour et al.

    Foot pain: is current or past shoewear a factor? The Framingham foot study

    Arthritis Rheum.

    (2009 Oct 15)
  • Cited by (6)

    • Pressure sensitivity for head, face and neck in relation to soft tissue

      2023, Applied Ergonomics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Many previous studies have investigated this area and measured the pressure sensitivity of various body parts, particularly the PPT (Pressure pain threshold) and PDT (Pressure discomfort threshold). For instance, the feet (Buso and Shitoot, 2019; Dueñas et al., 2021; Weerasinghe et al., 2017; Wiggermann and Keyserling, 2015; Xiong et al., 2011, 2013), the hands and elbows (Brigida et al., 2021; Le Johansson et al., 1999; Nasir et al., 2019), the back and buttock (Vink and Lips, 2017). This paper will concentrate on the head, face, and neck.

    View full text