Influence of age, gender and obesity on pressure discomfort threshold of the foot: A cross-sectional study.
Introduction
Foot pain is a highly prevalent health problem, 29% of women and 19% of men suffer from it.(Awale et al., 2016) The existence of high plantar pressures in certain areas of the foot has been associated to pain and discomfort(Mickle et al., 2010) even leading to hyperkeratosis(Barlow et al., 1990) and, subsequently, metatarsal and heel pain, especially in older people.(Akdemir et al., 2011; Hill et al., 2008) In addition, alteration of foot function in one area can instigate unfavourable outcomes such as high pressure onto a new area, imbalance and/or injury when walking.(Mickle et al., 2010)
Foot pressure has different effects, thus depending on its magnitude the resulting sensation can vary from superficial touch to pain, previously passing through discomfort.(Hong et al., 2005) Whereas superficial touch provides the sensory feed-back necessary for balance and locomotion, discomfort and pain are mechanisms that warn of potentially harmful situations.(Xiong et al., 2010)
The most frequent treatment options are advice acquiring appropriate fit shoes, plantar orthosis or footwear modifications.(van der Zwaard et al., 2011) Therefore, minimising foot pain and discomfort due to pressure generated during human locomotion is an important user requirement for plantar orthosis or shoes.
Pressure pain threshold (PPT), understood as the minimum pressure that induces pain, has been evaluated at selected locations or through a full plantar surface map.(Weerasinghe et al., 2017) It is generally accepted that discomfort is a precursor of pain. Thus, pressure discomfort threshold (PDT) understood as the minimum pressure that produces discomfort(Johansson et al., 1999) is presented as a more suitable standard in product design.(Goonetilleke, 2006) A foot plantar PDT pattern can provide valuable information for footwear and orthosis design, aid in preventing pain and identify individuals who may be at risk of developing or worsening an injury due to high pressure. It could also be useful in order to detect patients with loss of hypersensitivity and to evaluate the effects of treatments on various pathological conditions. But before studying the different conditions, the existence of normal patterns in healthy subjects are needed. However, few studies have focused on it.(Gonzalez et al., n.d.; Johansson et al., 1999; Weerasinghe et al., 2017; Xiong et al., 2010)
In addition, there are several potential risk factors for foot pain and discomfort that have been identified from cross-sectional studies, and should be taken in consideration: increased age with a prevalence between 14.9 and 41.9% of adults aged over 50 years,(Gorter et al., 2000) gender, with women having higher prevalence of foot pathologies(Dufour et al., 2009) and obesity, with obese people possibly being more sensitive to pain.(Okifuji et al., 2009) Unfortunately, there is limited knowledge on how foot discomfort relates to age, gender or body mass index (BMI).
In the present study it was hypothesized that there are different PDT depending on different areas of the foot plantar surface and that it modifies with age, gender and increase of BMI. Therefore, the main purpose of this study is to describe a pattern of PDT as a tool for the assessment of painful conditions of the foot.
Section snippets
Study design
A cross-sectional study was performed at the Biomechanics Institute of Valencia (Instituto de Biomecánica de Valencia) from January to March 2019. Participants were allocated to three different groups according to their age: Group 1 (G1) people aged 20 to 35, Group 2 (G2) aged 50 to 65 and Group 3 (G3) aged over 65. The gender distribution was done for the full sample in a balanced way to avoid possible biases, although it was not possible to balance all groups.
Each participant was assessed
Results
From the eligible 45 possible participants 36 were finally included (Fig. 2), aged between 20 and 81 (mean age 34.91, SD 17.60) and 50% women. A 30.56% of the sample had a BMI of 30 or more and were, therefore, considered obese. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants by age groups are depicted in Table 1. Variable distribution showed to be normal by the Shapiro-Wilk test.
Pearson's correlation between the pressure registered when the subject pronounced “Stop” was high both
Discussion
The results of the present study confirm the hypothesis that there is a PDT pattern for the foot surface and that it depends on age, gender and obesity. The three points of the heel area are the ones that have higher PDT with significant differences with the rest of the areas.
In general, heel and external midfoot areas showed more tolerance to higher pressures than the rest. These are the areas bearing most of the foot contact when walking, so they bear higher loads, are adapted to such an
Conclusions
This study has shown a pattern for PDT in the foot plantar surface, with significant higher thresholds on the heel and the midfoot which are related to first contact and adaptation when walking. Moreover, this research has provided an overview of the changes in the discomfort pattern of the foot associated with aging, gender and BMI, and that have considerable implications. There is a turning point around 65 years old when PDT is increased significantly on the heel, midfoot, and forefoot
Funding
The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article. No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.
Statement of the authors
All authors were fully involved in the study and preparation of the manuscript and the material within has not been and will not be submitted for publication elsewhere. Each of the authors has read and concurs with the content in the final manuscript.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.
References (39)
- et al.
Dissociation of motor and sensory inhibition processes in normal aging
Clin. Neurophysiol.
(2012 Apr) - et al.
Plantar pressure distribution patterns during gait in diabetic neuropathy patients with a history of foot ulcers
Clinics
(2009) - et al.
Pressure relief and load redistribution by custom-made insoles in diabetic patients with neuropathy and foot deformity
Clin. Biomech.
(2004 Jul) - et al.
In shoe pressure measurements during different motor tasks while wearing safety shoes: the effect of custom made insoles vs. prefabricated and off-the-shelf
Gait Posture
(2016 Oct) - et al.
The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
J. Clin. Epidemiol.
(2008 Apr) - et al.
Studying sex and gender differences in pain and analgesia: a consensus report
Pain
(2007 Nov) - et al.
The effect of aging on the biomechanical properties of plantar soft tissues
Clin. Biomech.
(2010 Jul 1) - et al.
Differences in foot sensitivity and plantar pressure between young adults and elderly
Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr.
(2016 Apr) - et al.
Plantar tactile sensory thresholds in healthy men and women
Foot.
(2006 Dec 1) - et al.
Standing and very slow walking: foot pain-pressure threshold, subjective pain experience and work activity
Appl. Ergon.
(2001 Feb)
Obese older adults suffer foot pain and foot-related functional limitation
Gait Posture
The effect of aging on the hardness of foot sole skin: a preliminary study
Foot Edinb. Scotl.
New alternative in treatment of callus
J. Dermatol.
Link between foot pain severity and prevalence of depressive symptoms
Arthritis Care Res.
Foot problems in the elderly
Clin. Rehabil.
Sex and gender differences in pain and inflammation: a rapidly maturing field
Am. J. Phys. Regul. Integr. Comp. Phys.
Analysis of pressure and loads under the foot. II. Quantitation of the dynamic distribution
Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas.
Plantar pressure measurements and the prevention of ulceration in the diabetic foot
J. Bone Joint Surg. (Br.)
Foot pain: is current or past shoewear a factor? The Framingham foot study
Arthritis Rheum.
Cited by (6)
Pressure sensitivity for head, face and neck in relation to soft tissue
2023, Applied ErgonomicsCitation Excerpt :Many previous studies have investigated this area and measured the pressure sensitivity of various body parts, particularly the PPT (Pressure pain threshold) and PDT (Pressure discomfort threshold). For instance, the feet (Buso and Shitoot, 2019; Dueñas et al., 2021; Weerasinghe et al., 2017; Wiggermann and Keyserling, 2015; Xiong et al., 2011, 2013), the hands and elbows (Brigida et al., 2021; Le Johansson et al., 1999; Nasir et al., 2019), the back and buttock (Vink and Lips, 2017). This paper will concentrate on the head, face, and neck.
Research progress of the plantar pressure monitoring system for gait analysis
2024, Kexue Tongbao/Chinese Science BulletinNomographic Model for Predicting Severe Foot Pain in Nurses from Tertiary Hospitals in China
2023, Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Science)Foot Functional Disability in Rheumatoid Arthritis: The Involvement of Body Mass Index
2023, Current Rheumatology Reviews